<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record Intact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/</link>
	<description>Inanity Reigns Supreme: The voice of Shalampax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneupnose</title>
		<link>http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneupnose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shalampax.com/blog/?p=780#comment-973</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-972&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@MadMadMargo&lt;/a&gt;: Yes, but the difference is that people eagerly await your posts and, therefore, are willing to wait for you. Us? Not so much, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-972" rel="nofollow">@MadMadMargo</a>: Yes, but the difference is that people eagerly await your posts and, therefore, are willing to wait for you. Us? Not so much, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMadMargo</title>
		<link>http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>MadMadMargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shalampax.com/blog/?p=780#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be embarrassed, Stoneupnose, every blogger is entitled to a day off here and there.  Look at me, I was away for 2 months after posting every day for over 6 months, I managed to survive.  Trust me, your followers understand, but we expect a rip-roarin&#039; post next time. (*wink*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be embarrassed, Stoneupnose, every blogger is entitled to a day off here and there.  Look at me, I was away for 2 months after posting every day for over 6 months, I managed to survive.  Trust me, your followers understand, but we expect a rip-roarin&#8217; post next time. (*wink*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoneupnose</title>
		<link>http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoneupnose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shalampax.com/blog/?p=780#comment-971</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-970&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@David&lt;/a&gt;: Yeah, I know. Some idiot here--I don&#039;t know who--stumbled on the word on some Web site. Obviously, the word must have been either used in a context that made its meaning obvious or the Web site must have explicitly provided the definition because none of us would ever have bothered to look the word up. We&#039;re far too lazy for that. Whatever the case. &quot;mortified&quot; entered our vocabulary, although it remains little-used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-970" rel="nofollow">@David</a>: Yeah, I know. Some idiot here&#8211;I don&#8217;t know who&#8211;stumbled on the word on some Web site. Obviously, the word must have been either used in a context that made its meaning obvious or the Web site must have explicitly provided the definition because none of us would ever have bothered to look the word up. We&#8217;re far too lazy for that. Whatever the case. &#8220;mortified&#8221; entered our vocabulary, although it remains little-used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.shalampax.com/blog/2009/09/30/record-intact/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shalampax.com/blog/?p=780#comment-970</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised to learn that &quot;mortified&quot; is even in the Shalampax dialect - who knew that Shalapaxians could ever have use for such a word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to learn that &#8220;mortified&#8221; is even in the Shalampax dialect &#8211; who knew that Shalapaxians could ever have use for such a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

